I'm a board certified behavior analyst specializing in relational and generative language for verbal autistic children: kids with strong rote repertoires who can't yet use what they know in novel, untaught situations. If that describes children on your caseload, I may be a useful referral.
Many verbal autistic children develop solid foundational repertoires — labeling, receptive identification, memorized scripts, reliable discrete-trial responding — yet plateau when language needs to become generative: answering novel questions, deriving untaught relations, sustaining flexible conversation, taking another's perspective.
In relational terms, these are children with intact directly-trained repertoires but limited derived relational responding — mutual and combinatorial entailment, transformation of stimulus function. The result is a learner who "knows" a great deal but struggles to use it flexibly in the moment.
This is the piece that many skill-acquisition and classroom programs aren't structured to target directly — not a shortcoming, just a different focus. It's the piece I specialize in.
Consider referring a verbal autistic child who:
Age isn't a barrier — I work across the developmental range. What matters is that there's a communicative foundation to build from.
My work is grounded in Relational Frame Theory and derived relational responding. I'm PEAK Level 2 certified and draw on the PEAK Relational Training System where it fits a given learner — but the foundation is RFT itself, not any single curriculum.
For assessment, I often use the PEAK Comprehensive Assessment (adapted for tele-delivery where appropriate) to build a qualitative profile of a child's relational repertoires — which frames are established, emerging, or absent. Intervention is individualized: multiple-exemplar training to build derived relational responding across coordination, distinction, comparison, opposition, hierarchy, and deictic framing — drawn from the PEAK curriculum where it's the right tool, and built directly from RFT principles where it isn't — with attention to transformation of stimulus function and generalization to novel contexts.
The throughline is generative language — a child using what they know in situations no one directly trained.
I've spent nearly 20 years in autism education and intervention, across the full developmental range — early intervention through adulthood — and across settings: self-contained special education classrooms, clinics, and homes.
For much of that time I watched bright, capable learners stall at rote, scripted language, and I was never satisfied with the idea that this was simply the ceiling. Discovering Relational Frame Theory and derived relational responding changed how I practice — it gave me a framework for teaching the flexible, generative language that had been missing. That relational work is now the entire focus of my practice.
Pass along this page or the one-pager, or reach out to me directly. There's no formal referral form — an email, or a family getting in touch, is enough.
Every family begins with a free discovery call, so we can make sure it's a good fit before anything else.
If it's a fit, I complete a Language Flexibility Profile — a PEAK-based relational assessment — and, where appropriate, begin one-to-one intervention.
With the family's consent, I'm glad to share findings and coordinate care. Closing the loop matters to me.
Private pay · one-to-one · serving families in Connecticut & New York.
I'm always glad to talk through a case — no commitment, and no formal referral needed just to ask.